We have often talked about the 4th Industrial revolution in terms of its impact on labour, the economy and business, but we have not considered its impact on our manners.
The inspiration comes from a recent Time magazine piece by columnist John Patrick Pullen (subscription required).
He relates the story of his young son learning to speak in part from the interactions Pullen has with the family home automation device, an Amazon Echo. He would simply issue instructions to the device and it would comply. When his son began to copy him, he wondered if he would know to treat people differently from the machine.
It appears that children are more focused on your behaviour than who it is directed at and whether it was justified. So it stands to reason children will learn as much from our treatment of machines than they will learn from our treatment of others; a point that parenting expert Nikki Bush makes.
The Australian NGO Child Friendly illustrated the point with the hard-hitting ad below.
Machines are typically programmed to be polite and have a history of being so (remember C3PO in Star Wars). Yet in not treating them, understandably, just like humans, we tend to default to treating them badly.
It is difficult to suggest you need to treat a machine as anything other than a machine, but then the reason for doing so is not to humour the machine but to maintain our civility.
Movies are hardly the best indicator for this, but many examples exist of faithful servant machines treated poorly by their owners or the dutiful machine rising up against a perceived unjust owner. It may reflect a truth about how we will treat them though. We are certainly happy to take out our anger at them.
Dr Helgo Schomer makes the point that while we tend to consider the impact the machines will have on us, it is actually the impact we will have on each other as a result of the interactions with machines that is the real indicator of our future.
Online communications tend to be far more critical than a face-to-face interactions. We know it is an issue but we somehow treat emails and social posts as not requiring the same level of civility that you would if you were talking to someone. It seems fair to assume we will do the same when interacting with machines.
Treating a machine badly is probably not that different from the justification that someone might hold for treating animals the same way.
Humanity's history of the treatment of others is terrible and we tend to start by treating others badly and only change when forced to.
Does it still seem like such a bad idea to say "please" and "thank you" to a machine if it means we will continue to say "please" and "thank you" to each other?
Recommendedby NEWSROOM AI
The pros and cons of subscribing to versus buying digital content.
As hype begins to grow around the Hyperloop, will it change how we travel or run out of track?
Grow or die is the law of the jungle, but does it still apply outside of the jungle?
The super fast new mobile internet may change the world, but it might not be for the better.
You could say elections are being disrupted.
Digital companies have had a good run, but new taxes are coming.
The Tshwane ANC says it has evidence that Mayor Solly Msimanga is central to several irregular appointments in his administration.
The Money Show’s Bruce Whitfield interviews Uys about his attitude toward money (hopes and fears, successes and failures, etc.).
Sobriety advocate Janet Gourand explains the differences between the social drinker and an almost alcoholic.
Two white callers, Matt and Stephanie, disagreed on how white people should respond to apartheid as Eusebius McKaiser facilitated.
Dr Stephen Devereux says a large number of black students are more vulnerable than their white counterparts.
Khabazela shares some tweets, Facebook posts and videos that have gone viral.
Check out the videos, tweets, Facebook posts that have gone viral and why this kid cheered her dad on in the toilet.