Business Unusual

Should a machine be allowed to use lethal force?

Micah Johnson is considered to be the first person killed by US police using a remote controlled device. The robot was a bomb disposal unit that police loaded with explosive and detonated near him.

It may be the first time it was done; it will not be the last. The question is under what circumstances could this be allowed and who should make the rules.

The much anticipated 4th Industrial Revolution has often been said to result in the loss of jobs; it is fair to say it will also lead to the loss of life.

Bizarrely, the morality on the use of robots appears as much part of science-fiction as anything else with Isaac Asimov’s Three Laws from his short story Runaround.

  • A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
  • A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
  • A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.

That did not preclude robots from using lethal force though. Early versions have existed for decades to protect ships from missile attacks. The Lethal Autonomous Weapons, ironically known as LAWS, are far more accurate and dependable than humans at shooting down incoming missiles. Israel uses the Iron Dome system to stop rockets fired on populated areas and South Korea has remotely operated sentry guns along their border with North Korea. The sentry guns first broadcast a warning and require a human operator to actually fire, although they can operate on their own.

The illustrates the three Ds of robotics for ideal use:

  • Dangerous situations
  • Dirty operations
  • Dull repetitive work

The word itself comes from the Slavic languages in which robata were serfs required to work for a certain period of the year for their landlords. In many ways it fits for the work humanity expects from their mechanical descendants.

There are two considerations for when robots would be allowed to use lethal force against humans.

Would the technology be good enough to consider all the options a trained and responsible human would?

Could humanity ethically allow a machine to take a life?

The technology will improve to allow the first part to be satisfied although it will be some time before it could be done with confidence. The Tesla crash in May appears to be as a result of the car's cameras not being able to see the truck it crashed into.

The second even humans struggle with, let alone know how get a machine to determine it.

To illustrate the basic issue consider the Trolley problem. Four scenarios to determine what you would do to avert someone being killed including an option when actively killing one person would spare you killing others.

Driverless car makers are wrestling with what a car should do if placed in a situation that would save others by killing you.

Then there is the issue that, with robots being used for safety work and surveillance, they would then be best placed to react to the situation, especially if others are in harm's way. The use of military surveillance drones to become attack drones followed this path. Some argue that if poor weather or signal jamming might affect the remote control of the drone, a scenario should exist to allow the mission to continue autonomously.

When the next steps are seemingly so close together we are likely to find ourselves having the ability to kill before we have resolved if we should be willing to do so.

The Campaign to Stop Killer Robots hopes to prevent it ever getting to that. At a meeting last year over 1000 experts - including Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk - signed a letter warning that machines should not be allowed to use lethal force.

But perhaps there are scenarios that robots should be allowed to overrule an operator. Consider an aircraft that is made to perform an operation by a pilot that would cause the plane to crash - The German Wings flight 9525 that was intentionally flown into a mountain in a suicide/murder that killed 144. Should aircraft allow operators to do this? In an attempt to make flight more safe, pilots are required to do so little that some argue that in an emergency situation they would not be able to deal with it.

These are serious considerations that are not decades away. Citizens could defer to experts, although it would be best if most were more informed and offer a view of how they would like to imagine a future for themselves and their children.


Recommended

by NEWSROOM AI
Read More
Technology disrupted tax income, but nobody escapes taxes

Technology disrupted tax income, but nobody escapes taxes

Digital companies have had a good run, but new taxes are coming.

Solving puzzles and mysteries, and what all of us may be missing about it

Solving puzzles and mysteries, and what all of us may be missing about it

At last, a way to future proof yourself against the 4th Industrial Revolution.

Boredom, loneliness and addiction

Boredom, loneliness and addiction

The best way to describe our relationship with the internet is “it's complicated".

The world is reliant on fertilizer and this is who controls most of it

The world is reliant on fertilizer and this is who controls most of it

One country holds as much as 70% of the world’s phosphate and we can’t feed the world without it.

How Instagram captured the moment

How Instagram captured the moment

An app so simple even Steve Jobs would have been proud.

Serving coffee beans to human beings

Serving coffee beans to human beings

How Starbucks grew a coffee shop into a global brand.

Popular articles
Robots are already replacing financial advisors right here in South Africa

Robots are already replacing financial advisors right here in South Africa

But can they be trusted? Are they independent? Bruce Whitfield interviews Personal Financial Advisor Warren Ingram.

Madiba’s private secretary Zelda la Grange opens up about money (hers and his)

Madiba’s private secretary Zelda la Grange opens up about money (hers and his)

Bruce Whitfield interviews La Grange about her and Madiba's attitude to money (hopes and fears, successes and failures, etc.)

You’re either a ‘money slave’ or a ‘money master’ (says author of 'My Money')

You’re either a ‘money slave’ or a ‘money master’ (says author of 'My Money')

The Money Show’s Bruce Whitfield interviews Sugar Creek financial expert and author of “My Money” Gerald Mwandiambira.

How to make money through ‘buy-to-let’ (using very little of your own money)

How to make money through ‘buy-to-let’ (using very little of your own money)

Bruce Whitfield interviews Francois Janse van Rensburg, author of “Making Money through Buy-To-Let in South Africa".

Retirement: 8 biggest mistakes people typically make…

Retirement: 8 biggest mistakes people typically make…

The Money Show’s Bruce Whitfield interviews Galileo Capital Financial Advisor Warren Ingram.

UPDATE: Chilling WhatsApp from Marli van Breda's ex-boyfriend read out in court

UPDATE: Chilling WhatsApp from Marli van Breda's ex-boyfriend read out in court

Marli van Breda's ex took the stand in the trial of triple murder accused Henri van Breda.

3 easy questions could bag you R2000!

3 easy questions could bag you R2000!

WIN R2000! But only if you can prove you're a whiz of the MTN Biz Quiz by answering the following three questions...

Meet Errol Musk - father of Elon, the most innovative entrepreneur of our age

Meet Errol Musk - father of Elon, the most innovative entrepreneur of our age

Elon Musk, as you’d expect, hails from an exceptional family. Bruce Whitfield interviews his Capetonian father.