Last week SAA cabin crew downed tools, demanding, among other things, an increase in the daily meal allowance from $131 a day to $170.
With this as background; what should employees and employers know about allowances, and disputes surrounding them?
Molatudi discussed the following five points:
Allowances (i.e. extra payments, either cash or in kind) can be a discretionary (e.g. an incentive bonus, or what is commonly referred to as a 13th cheque) or a contractual entitlement (e.g. a car or transport allowance). To have a claim; allowances must be provided for in a contract, otherwise they will then form part of collective bargaining in the form of demands.
Other examples of allowances are discretionary payments (e.g. a tool allowance; a relocation allowance; a meal allowance; a share incentive or discretionary profit-sharing scheme; an entertainment allowance; an education or schooling allowance).
In the event of a dispute regarding allowances; employees have a choice to refer an unfair labour practice dispute to the CCMA for arbitration; or opt to go on a protected strike – and this will depend on how they describe the nature of the dispute.
The challenging part (in the context of the current SAA strike) is how the dispute is described. Our courts have held that disputes over provision of benefits (comprising allowances) fall into two categories: 1) Where the dispute is not based on an allegation that the granting or removal of that benefit is unfair, strike action is the remedy. 2) Where the dispute concerns the fairness or otherwise of the employer’s conduct, such dispute may be refereed to arbitration.
- The distinguishing factor is the employer's conduct versus the nature of the employees' demand(s). In the SAA case, the employees are not complaining about the provision of the meal allowance, but they are deadlocked with SAA for refusing to increase it to a particular amount (their demand). In respect of the former – ordinarily, employees would complain that the employer's exercise of discretion in providing the benefit is unfair, whereas in respect of the latter – the complaint is that the employer is refusing to increase it thus making it a dispute of mutual interest and consequently one over which the employees may strike. It should be noted that an employee may not strike alone over a claim for an increase of a particular allowance – it has to be a group of employees acting in concert.
For more detail; listen to the interview in the audio below.
Enter your email address in the form below to receive a newsletter containing the most-read articles of the week from Bruce Whitfield’s The Money Show every Friday morning in your inbox.
Recommendedby NEWSROOM AI
Venezuela – once as rich as Norway – is suffering an apocalyptic collapse without precedent.
The Money Show’s Bruce Whitfield interviews Fairtree Capital Portfolio Manager Jean-Pierre Verster.
The Money Show’s Bruce Whitfield interviews Truworths CEO, Michael Mark.
The Money Show’s Bruce Whitfield interviews Lonmin CEO Ben Magara.
Bruce Whitfield asks Personal Financial Advisor Warren Ingram for advice on how investors can safely navigate this hectic time.
A school with individual learning paths for each child, and no need for textbooks? SPARK Schools CEO Stacey Brewer joins Bruce Whitfield.
Tensions are rife in the East Joburg township as the community attacked and killed criminals.
Khabazela shares YouTube videos gone viral including a barmaid hitting a colleague who slapped her rear during a routine.
Former police minister Adriaan Vlok has rejected accusations that former minister Malan was at the centre of a paedophile ring.
Philemon Letwaba says Tshepo's case relates to some of the issues that they are dealing with on a daily basis.
Khabazela shares tweets & videos that have gone viral including a parrot that told firefighters the F-word during its rescue.
Check out the videos, tweets, Facebook posts that have gone viral and why this kid cheered her dad on in the toilet.